A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a simple logical framework for default reasoning. The semantics is normal first order model theory; instead of changing the logic, the way in which the logic is used is changed. Rather than expecting reasoning to be just deduction (in any logic) from our knowledge, we examine the consequences of viewing reasoning as a very simple case of theory formation. By treating defaults as predefined possible hypotheses we show how this idea subsumes the intuition behind Reiter’s default logic. Solutions to multiple extension problems are discussed. A prototype implementation, called Theorist, executes all of the examples given.
منابع مشابه
Probabilistically Reliable Default Reasoning
This paper superimposes an assumption generation mechanism (AGM) and a lower bound propagation mechanism (LBM) on default reasoning. AGM generates minimal probabilistic assumptions which are needed to derive default conclusions safely, and LBM supplies (approximately) tight lower probability bounds of the conclusions. Together both mechanisms make default reasoning probabilistically reliable. T...
متن کاملA Logical Study on Qualitative Default Reasoning with Probabilities
Only very special subclasses of probability distributions can be used for qualitative reasoning that meets basic logical demands. Snow’s atomic bound systems (big-stepped probabilities) provide one positive example for such a subclass. This paper presents a thorough investigation of the formal logical relationships between qualitative and probabilistic default reasoning. We start with formalizi...
متن کاملA Default-Logic Framework for Legal Reasoning in Multiagent Systems
Using law and evidence to achieve fair and accurate decisions in numerous legal cases requires a complex multiagent system. This paper discusses a framework based on many-valued, predicate, default logic that successfully captures legal knowledge, integrates and evaluates expert and non-expert evidence, coordinates agents working on different legal problems, and evolves the knowledge model over...
متن کاملOn Default Representation of Defeasible Inference and Specificity
We suggest a new representation of defeasible entailment and specificity in the framework of default logic. The representation is based on augmenting the underlying classical language with the language of conditionals having its own (monotonic) internal logic. It is shown, in particular, that inheritance reasoning can be naturally represented in this framework, and generalized to the full class...
متن کاملA Framework for Cumulative Default Logics
We present a framework for default reasoning which has its roots in Reiter's Default Logic. Contrary to Reiter, however, we do not consider defaults as inference rules used to generate extensions of a classical set of facts. In our approach defaults are elements of the logical language, and we will deene inference rules on defaults. This has several advantages. First of all, we can reason about...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 36 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1988